Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Rosters
Apr 12, 2020 9:56:54 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2020 9:56:54 GMT -5
Can we discuss the 2RBs. Think we have too many teams for this. With a mandatory start of 2 RBs, teams would need to carry a minimum of 3RBs. There just aren’t 72 RBs worth keeping in the NFL.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2020 12:33:44 GMT -5
Could always make the 2nrd RB spot a flex spot. RB,TE,WR.
|
|
|
|
Rosters
Apr 12, 2020 13:54:37 GMT -5
Post by Admin on Apr 12, 2020 13:54:37 GMT -5
I am open to discussing this. The reason I set it up like this is because the first league I was in ran 2 RB and it made RB more valuable, but I think it today's game they are already pretty valuable, so I am definitely open to hearing ideas and thoughts here
|
|
|
|
Post by Arizona Cardinals (Chris) on Apr 13, 2020 13:14:04 GMT -5
I think 1 required RB and the option to utilize a RB as a flex would be ideal.
|
|
|
|
Rosters
Apr 13, 2020 14:56:41 GMT -5
Post by Admin on Apr 13, 2020 14:56:41 GMT -5
So if we take a RB spot out are you guys thinking making it 2 Flex spots, making it an additional bench spot, or cutting rosters to 25?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Rosters
Apr 13, 2020 15:16:40 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2020 15:16:40 GMT -5
I'd prefer the roster size stay the same and it just being 2 flex spots.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Rosters
Apr 13, 2020 18:56:07 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2020 18:56:07 GMT -5
I’m open to any option, just don’t think having to start 2 RBs will be feasible in a league this size. Just from experience in the DFL. I’ve been trying to find 1 decent RB for like 5yrs. Can’t imagine trying to acquire 2 of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Apr 14, 2020 18:48:15 GMT -5
Alright, I think once we get a number closer to full we will put a vote to keep same, go 2 Flex, or just cut a RB and add a bench spot.
I think those are the 3 best options to discuss and go with
|
|
